From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. H & P Capital, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 4, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-0335 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:12-cv-0335

02-04-2013

Shameka Jones, Plaintiff v. H & P Capital, Inc., Defendant


Magistrate Judge Abel


Discovery Dispute Order

On February 4, 2013, counsel for the parties participated in a telephone discovery dispute conference with the Court. During the conference, plaintiff's January 16, 2013 motion to compel responses to her written discovery requests (doc. 17) was GRANTED to the following extent. Defendant H&P Capital, Inc. is ORDERED to formally responds to plaintiff's first and second set of written discovery requests on or before February 18, 2013. If a response to a discovery request is that the documents/information sought is not relevant, the answer should state whether H&P has documents/information responsive to the request and explain why the request does not seek information relevant to a material disputed issue in this lawsuit.

Mark R. Abel

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. H & P Capital, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 4, 2013
Civil Action 2:12-cv-0335 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Jones v. H & P Capital, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Shameka Jones, Plaintiff v. H & P Capital, Inc., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:12-cv-0335 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2013)