Opinion
No. 62694
03-13-2013
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying petitioner's motion to dismiss an indictment as deficient. The indictment charges petitioner with murder with the use of a deadly weapon under two theories—(1) premeditated and deliberate murder and/or (2) as a result of a challenge to fight—and that the petitioner and his codefendant are criminally liable for the murder under three theories—(1) by directly committing the act, (2) pursuant to a conspiracy to commit murder or an assault with a deadly weapon, and/or (3) by aiding or abetting in the commission of the crime through various acts. Petitioner argues that the indictment is deficient because it expands the elements of murder and fails to properly state the elements of NRS 200.450 (the challenge-to-fight statute). In this, he argues that the terms "conspiracy" and "aiding and abetting" do not appear in NRS 200.450 and therefore the State may not allege that he committed a violation of NRS 200.450 through a "conspiracy" to commit murder or by aiding or abetting his codefendant to commit murder. Reading the plain language of the indictment, we conclude that petitioner's argument lacks merit and that the indictment is not deficient. Because petitioner has not demonstrated that the district court manifestly abused its discretion or exceeded its jurisdiction by denying petitioner's motion to dismiss, see NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981), we
We deny petitioner's emergency motion for a stay of the district court proceedings filed on March 7, 2013.
_______________, J.
Gibbons
_______________, J.
Douglas
_______________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
Gordon Silver
Clark County District Attorney
Attorney General/Carson City