From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-3929-L (N.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2013)

Summary

collecting Texas cases

Summary of this case from PNC Bank v. Irvin Family Ltd.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-3929-L

07-09-2013

CHARLES JONES AND KATHERINE JONES, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL I INC., TRUST 2006-HE2 and AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY, Defendants.


ORDER

Before the court is Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 5), filed November 5, 2012. The motion was referred to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, who entered Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") on June 19, 2013, recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted but that Plaintiffs should be permitted to file an amended complaint. The magistrate judge further recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss be denied as moot if Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. No objections to the Report were filed. On July 2, 2013, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint.

Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, in light of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, the court denies as moot Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 5).

It is so ordered this 9th day of July, 2013.

/s/_________

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jones v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-3929-L (N.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2013)

collecting Texas cases

Summary of this case from PNC Bank v. Irvin Family Ltd.
Case details for

Jones v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JONES AND KATHERINE JONES, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:12-CV-3929-L (N.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2013)

Citing Cases

Rivers v. Bank of Am., N.A.

This theory has been held to be without merit because, under Texas law, "promissory notes and deeds of trust…

Rivers v. Bank of Am., N.A.

This theory has been held to be without merit because, under Texas law, "promissory notes and deeds of trust…