Opinion
No. CV 11-01115-PHX-JAT
12-19-2011
ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Stipulation and Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of Arbitration (Doc. 16).
On June 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court requesting relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (Doc. 1). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant wrongfully discriminated against him in the terms and conditions of his employment and he was subjected to sexual harassment and a discriminatory hostile work environment based on his sex. (Id. at 4). On August 23, 2011, the Parties filed a stipulation with the Court conceding that this litigation is subject to mandatory arbitration pursuant to contracts between the Parties.
Although 9 U.S.C. section 3 directs the Court, upon application by one of the parties, to grant a stay pending arbitration, the Court retains discretion to dismiss the case instead. Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. Co., 864 F.2d 635, 638 (9th Cir.1988). Because all of Plaintiff's claims are covered by binding agreements to arbitrate, the Court will dismiss his claims without prejudice to reopen upon the conclusion of arbitration proceedings, if necessary. Based on the foregoing,
IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation and Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of Arbitration is denied (Doc. 16).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the arbitration provisions governing Plaintiff's claims.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. If the Parties need to reappear before this Court for any reason relating to the arbitration of the claims in Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1), either party may move to reopen this case within the applicable statute of limitations for review of an arbitration award.
____________
James A. Teilborg
United States District Judge