From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Corizon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 18, 2015
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-786-WHA (wo) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2015)

Summary

stating the circumvention of departmental regulations or policies does not assert a violation of an inmate's constitutional rights (citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995), and Harris v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 817 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1987))

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Edge

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-786-WHA (wo)

08-18-2015

THOMAS EDWARD JONES, #140289, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, et al., Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day,

Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. No costs are taxed.

DONE this 18th day of August, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jones v. Corizon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 18, 2015
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-786-WHA (wo) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2015)

stating the circumvention of departmental regulations or policies does not assert a violation of an inmate's constitutional rights (citing Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995), and Harris v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ., 817 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1987))

Summary of this case from Jenkins v. Edge
Case details for

Jones v. Corizon

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS EDWARD JONES, #140289, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-786-WHA (wo) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Geter

Even if staff had departed from the applicable Regulations and policies, however, Thomas is not entitled to…

Jenkins v. Edge

See Wallace v. Fed. Det. Ctr., 528 F. App'x 160, 162-63 (3d Cir. 2013) (noting that, even if § 541.5(a) was…