From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Cnty. of Sonoma

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02730-CRB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02730-CRB

08-02-2023

CHRISTINE JONES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Christine Jones brings § 1983 claims against the County of Sonoma, the Sonoma County Public Defender's Office, the City of Santa Rosa, the Santa Rosa Police Department, and two individual defendants, Fabiola Manai and Matthew North, alleging that Defendants failed to provide her with body camera footage of her son's arrest and assault. See Compl. (dkt 1).

Defendants have filed two motions to dismiss and attest that the motions were served on Jones on the date they were filed. See dkts 13-2; 16. Jones's opposition to each motion was due on July 24 and July 31, respectively, but Jones has failed to file any opposition. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE by August 23 why this case should not be terminated for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to respond will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Cnty. of Sonoma

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02730-CRB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Jones v. Cnty. of Sonoma

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE JONES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02730-CRB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)