From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Box Elder County, Utah

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 4, 1933
67 F.2d 900 (10th Cir. 1933)

Opinion

No. 885.

December 4, 1933.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge.

Suit by Ricy W. Jones and another against Box Elder County, Utah, T.L. Davis, and others, County Commissioners of Box Elder County, wherein E.H. Jones and others were interpleaded as defendants. From the decree, plaintiff and interpleaded defendants appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Ricy H. Jones, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellants.

Lewis Jones, of Brigham, Utah (Wm. E. Davis, of Brigham, Utah, on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS and BRATTON, Circuit Judges, and SYMES, District Judge.


The facts in this case were stated in detail on the former appeal. 52 F.2d 340. It, therefore, is unnecessary to restate them. This court sustained the jurisdiction of the District Court of the subject-matter in controversy and likewise sustained the tax liens involved for certain years, with interest, penalties, and costs, without prejudice to a further suit for the recovery of the taxes, interest, penalties, and costs assessed for other years. Certiorari was denied. 285 U.S. 555, 52 S. Ct. 456, 76 L. Ed. 944. The case was remanded for the entry of a proper decree conforming to the decision of this court. No retrial was contemplated. A proper mandate seasonably issued, and pursuant to its provisions the trial court entered a decree conforming thereto in every essential respect. This appeal was taken from that action.

Appellants renew and argue extendedly virtually every question presented and decided adversely to them on the former appeal, no new question arising since the former decision being involved. They will not be heard to do that; they cannot open and present the entire case anew. In the absence of the exception suggested in Pennsylvania Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers of America (C.C.A.) 28 F.2d 851, the former decision is res adjudicata; it constitutes the settled law of the case and is binding upon the parties. We merely determine whether the last decree conforms to the mandate. Stewart v. Salamon, 97 U.S. 361, 24 L. Ed. 1044; Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant Railway Co., 168 U.S. 451, 18 S. Ct. 121, 42 L. Ed. 539; United States v. New York Indians, 173 U.S. 464, 19 S. Ct. 487, 43 L. Ed. 769; Richardson v. Ainsa, 218 U.S. 289, 31 S. Ct. 23, 54 L. Ed. 1044; Utah Light Power Co. v. Woody (C.C.A. 10) 62 F.2d 613. The last decree conforms in every material respect to the former decision of this court and the mandate issued thereon.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Jones v. Box Elder County, Utah

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 4, 1933
67 F.2d 900 (10th Cir. 1933)
Case details for

Jones v. Box Elder County, Utah

Case Details

Full title:JONES et al. v. BOX ELDER COUNTY, UTAH, et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Dec 4, 1933

Citations

67 F.2d 900 (10th Cir. 1933)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sandoval

State of Kansas ex rel. Beck v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 95 F.2d 935, 936 (10th Cir. 1938)(Bratton, J.). See…

SESSIONS v. THOS. D. DEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

Other cases have held that the law of the case is "res judicata" so far as the appellate court is concerned…