Jones v. Allenby

Full title: CLAY JOSEPH JONES, Plaintiff, v. CLIFF ALLENBY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

2:14-cv-2849 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

CLAY JOSEPH JONES, Plaintiff, v. CLIFF ALLENBY, et al., Defendants No. 2:14-cv-2849 KJM KJN P United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 14, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Fresno County, which is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This court has not ruled on plaintiff s request to proceed in forma pauperis;

         2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721