From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnston v. Brisco

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division
May 26, 2006
Civil No. 06-3002 (W.D. Ark. May. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3002.

May 26, 2006


ORDER


Now on this 26th day of May 2006, there comes on for consideration Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. 64) Plaintiffs' response and oppositions to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 62) and Plaintiffs' memo brief in support of response and oppositions to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 63). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. 64) is GRANTED.

There comes on further for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on May 5, 2006, by the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 61.) Plaintiffs filed objections to the report and recommendations. (Doc. 65.)

The Court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Separate Defendants' Judge Gordon Webb, Judge John Putman, Judge Gary Isbell, James Johnson, and Trish Smith motion to dismiss (Doc. 26) is GRANTED and the complaint against them is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnston v. Brisco

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division
May 26, 2006
Civil No. 06-3002 (W.D. Ark. May. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Johnston v. Brisco

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. JOHNSTON and MELANIE K. JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs, v. JASON BRISCO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Harrison Division

Date published: May 26, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-3002 (W.D. Ark. May. 26, 2006)