From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Wmata

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 20, 2007
936 A.2d 836 (D.C. 2007)

Summary

finding physician's testimony insufficient where that testimony showed that plaintiff's injury was not inconsistent with the normal operation of a bus

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.

Opinion

No. 05-CV-1167.

November 20, 2007.

Rankin.


Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Wmata

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 20, 2007
936 A.2d 836 (D.C. 2007)

finding physician's testimony insufficient where that testimony showed that plaintiff's injury was not inconsistent with the normal operation of a bus

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Case details for

Johnson v. Wmata

Case Details

Full title:Johnson v. WMATA

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

936 A.2d 836 (D.C. 2007)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.

Such testimony is not persuasive in the absence of corroborating testimony about the nature of the fall or…

O'Connell v. Maryland Steel Erectors, Inc.

The actual wording of the statute seems to sustain such a limited construction, for other sections which…