From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
2:14-cv-02101-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          POTTER HANDY By MARK POTTER Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON

          DOWNEY BRAND LLP By MATTHEW J. WEBER Attorney for Defendant VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES, INC.


          STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

          Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys herein, that defendant VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES, INC., has up to and including January 12, 2015, to file a responsive pleading. The responsive pleading was due on December 29, 2014, but a request to extend the time to respond was made by counsel for Defendant due to counsel and the parties being unavailable because of the holidays.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ORDER

         Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause therefore,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES, INC., has up to and including January 12, 2015, to respond to the Complaint herein.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
2:14-cv-02101-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. Van De Pol Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES, INC., a California…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-02101-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)