From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 24, 1995
658 A.2d 1035 (D.C. 1995)

Opinion

No. 91-CF-5.

May 24, 1995.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, and RUIZ, Associate Judges; BELSON, Senior Judge.

Former Associate Judge Sullivan was a member of the division that decided this case. After his departure from the court, Associate Judge Farrell was selected by lot to consider this petition.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 10, 1994, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 5, 1995.


Summaries of

Johnson v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 24, 1995
658 A.2d 1035 (D.C. 1995)
Case details for

Johnson v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:William JOHNSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: May 24, 1995

Citations

658 A.2d 1035 (D.C. 1995)