From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:22-cv-01362-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01362-TLN-CKD

02-07-2023

KEVIN B. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a former county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 1, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 1, 2022, (ECF No. 16), are adopted in full; and
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 7, 2023
2:22-cv-01362-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN B. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01362-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2023)