Opinion
Case No. 12-cv-32-SM
01-27-2012
ORDER
Motion denied. Plaintiff has not complied with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). In addition, the motion, complaint, and supporting papers do not suggest that a threat of imminent irreparable injury exists. The papers, at most, suggest a potential claim for constitutional deprivations related to an apparent seizure of plaintiff's person and property. The Magistrate Judge will preliminarily review the complaint in due course.
SO ORDERED.
______________
Steven J. McAuliffe
United States District Judge
cc: David Johnson, pro se