From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Tinsley

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 22, 1964
337 F.2d 856 (10th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 7795.

October 22, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado; William E. Doyle, Judge.

Richard J. Beacom, Westminster, Colo., for appellant.

Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and John E. Bush, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and HILL and SETH, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the trial court, denying the writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed for the reasons so ably expressed by the opinion of that court reported in 234 F. Supp. 866.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Tinsley

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 22, 1964
337 F.2d 856 (10th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Johnson v. Tinsley

Case Details

Full title:James Albert JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Harry C. TINSLEY, Warden, Colorado…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 1964

Citations

337 F.2d 856 (10th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Gehl v. People

Burns v. U.S., 287 U.S. 216, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L. Ed. 266. This position has been reiterated in Johnson v.…