From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Thaler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 14, 2013
541 F. App'x 479 (5th Cir. 2013)

Summary

imposing sanction bar after noting that plaintiff had accumulated three strikes

Summary of this case from Johnson v. TDCJ Health Servs. Div.

Opinion

No. 13-40237

2013-10-14

ELLOYD JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. RICK THALER, Defendant-Appellee


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:12-CV-201

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Elloyd Johnson, Texas prisoner # 840854, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) because it was untimely. By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Johnson is challenging the district court's certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Johnson's contention that the district court should have transferred his pleading to the Western District of Texas for inclusion in a closed case is frivolous. He has not shown that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. See Moore v. McDonald, 30 F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir. 1994).

The district court's dismissal of the instant suit and this court's dismissal of the appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for purposes of § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Johnson has at least one other strike. See Johnson v. Grounds, No. 12-50213 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2012). As he now has accumulated three strikes under § 1915(g), Johnson is advised that he is no longer allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is detained or incarcerated in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; § 1915(g) SANCTION BAR IMPOSED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Thaler

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 14, 2013
541 F. App'x 479 (5th Cir. 2013)

imposing sanction bar after noting that plaintiff had accumulated three strikes

Summary of this case from Johnson v. TDCJ Health Servs. Div.
Case details for

Johnson v. Thaler

Case Details

Full title:ELLOYD JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. RICK THALER, Defendant-Appellee

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 14, 2013

Citations

541 F. App'x 479 (5th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Mounce v. Doe

"'Subjective recklessness,'" as used in the criminal law, is the appropriate test for deliberate…

Johnson v. TDCJ Health Servs. Div.

This claim lacks merit because plaintiff has clearly accumulated three strikes. Johnson v. Thaler, 541 F.…