From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Tapajna

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division
Nov 1, 2010
CAUSE NO. 2:10-CV-362 RM (N.D. Ind. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 2:10-CV-362 RM.

November 1, 2010


OPINION and ORDER


The court has the obligation to inquire into its own subject matter jurisdiction. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 2007). The plaintiffs' complaint does not allege the existence of jurisdiction; the complaint alleges that Diana and Darrell Johnson are the parents of Megan Johnson, but is silent as to the citizenship of plaintiffs Diana and Darrell Johnson. The plaintiffs must show the citizenship of each party as of the date the complaint was filed. Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d at 534; Dausch v. Rykse, 9 F.3d 1244, 1245 (7th Cir. 1993). Although the case may be subject to dismissal on this ground,Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d at 534, the court instead affords the plaintiffs twenty days from the date of this order within which to file an amended complaint alleging the existence of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: November 1, 2010


Summaries of

Johnson v. Tapajna

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division
Nov 1, 2010
CAUSE NO. 2:10-CV-362 RM (N.D. Ind. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Tapajna

Case Details

Full title:MEGAN JOHNSON, DIANA J. JOHNSON, and DARRELL JOHNSON, Plaintiffs v. RACHEL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

CAUSE NO. 2:10-CV-362 RM (N.D. Ind. Nov. 1, 2010)