From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 24, 2023
3:22cv105 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

3:22cv105

03-24-2023

JEFFREY S. JOHNSON Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY

WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Mar 24, 2023
3:22cv105 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY S. JOHNSON Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

3:22cv105 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 24, 2023)