From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 27, 1942
30 Ala. App. 593 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)

Opinion

6 Div. 980.

October 27, 1942.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John C. Morrow, Judge.

Petition of Walter Woodrow Johnson for habeas corpus to fix bail under indictment for robbery. From the order or judgment of the Circuit Judge fixing bail at thirty-five hundred dollars, petitioner appeals.

Modified and affirmed.

Horace C. Alford, of Birmingham, for appellant.

Wm. N. McQueen, Atty. Gen., for the State.


This appeal is from an order and judgment of the lower court in a proceeding of habeas corpus, wherein it is contended that excessive bail was fixed and required by the trial judge, and review and modification of such order and judgment is here sought; the prayer being for the reduction of bail to a reasonable amount in lieu of the suggested excessive bail fixed.

On the question of bail our Constitution, among other things, expressly provides "that excessive bail shall not in any case be required." Const. 1901, Art. 1, § 16.

One of the principal purposes for the foregoing quoted provision is, manifestly, that reasonable bail should not be denied for the purpose of punishing a person charged with crime. Bail is exacted for the sole purpose of securing the attendance of the defendant at court at all times when his presence may be lawfully required, and his surrendering himself in execution of any legal judgment that may be pronounced against him.

As to the instant proceeding, the record before us follows in every detail the statutory requirements in an appeal of this nature.

We have, as is our duty, read and carefully considered all of the evidence adduced below. We refrain, of course, from a recitation here of any part of such evidence; some of which being unsavory, sordid and immoral as to several of the persons involved. As to this petitioner we are of the opinion he is entitled to the relief sought, and that it would meet every requirement of law that he furnish a bail bond with good and sufficient sureties as the law provides and requires, and that such bond be executed in the sum of five hundred ($500.) dollars. The order and judgment of the lower court is hereby modified to the extent stated.

Modified and affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Oct 27, 1942
30 Ala. App. 593 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 27, 1942

Citations

30 Ala. App. 593 (Ala. Crim. App. 1942)
10 So. 2d 298

Citing Cases

Gusick v. Boies

While there is a split in the authorities, Arizona is, we believe, properly committed to the view that in…

Ex Parte State

The statute is mandatory, and trial court has no discretion but to follow the procedure. Johnson v. State, 30…