From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 2, 1936
199 N.E. 603 (Ohio 1936)

Opinion

No. 25735

Decided January 2, 1936.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Jury — Stepmother of assistant prosecuting attorney's wife member of jury — Denial of constitutional right of accused to be tried by impartial jury — Counsel's want of due diligence in discovering such family relationship.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Stark county.

Mr. Price Janson and Mr. Paul Van Nostran, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George N. Graham, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. A.C.L. Barthelmeh, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 2, 1936
199 N.E. 603 (Ohio 1936)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. THE STATE OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 2, 1936

Citations

199 N.E. 603 (Ohio 1936)
199 N.E. 603