From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Nov 11, 2009
No. 04-08-00919-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 11, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-08-00919-CR

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2007-CR-2356, Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding. MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED.

Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Chief Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Michael Johnson pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. In accordance with the plea, the trial court sentenced Johnson to twenty-five years confinement. Johnson appealed. Johnson's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which she raises no arguable points of error and concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Johnson was provided a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. Johnson did not file a brief. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we find no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Johnson's counsel and affirm the trial court's judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Johnson wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.


Summaries of

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Nov 11, 2009
No. 04-08-00919-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Johnson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael JOHNSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Nov 11, 2009

Citations

No. 04-08-00919-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 11, 2009)