From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. St. Andle

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 27, 2023
2:22-cv-1412 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1412 TLN AC P

02-27-2023

MARCUS D. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. ST. ANDRE, Respondent.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

By order filed January 9, 2023, the petition was screened and found to not state any cognizable claims for relief. ECF No. 7. Petitioner was given thirty days to file an amended petition. Id. Thirty days have now passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court's order. Petitioner will be given one final opportunity to file an amended petition and is cautioned that failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall file an amended petition within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning.


Summaries of

Johnson v. St. Andle

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 27, 2023
2:22-cv-1412 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. St. Andle

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS D. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. ST. ANDRE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 27, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1412 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023)