From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
No. 5:15CV00129-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2015)

Opinion

No. 5:15CV00129-JLH-JJV

07-23-2015

DERRICK JOHNSON, ADC #106719 PLAINTIFF v. RUSSELL, Dentist, Correctional Care Solutions; et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2015.

/s/_________

J. LEON HOLMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
No. 5:15CV00129-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK JOHNSON, ADC #106719 PLAINTIFF v. RUSSELL, Dentist, Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2015

Citations

No. 5:15CV00129-JLH-JJV (E.D. Ark. Jul. 23, 2015)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Hutchinson

Furthermore, there is no imminent danger exception to the PLRA's exhaustion requirements. See Johnson v.…

Cody v. Richardson

There is no imminent danger exception to the PLRA's exhaustion requirements. See Johnson v. Russell, No.…