From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Ruffaine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2013
Case No.2:12-cv-02091-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.2:12-cv-02091-WBS-EFB

01-25-2013

Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff; v. John Ruffaine, et al, Defendants

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson


SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR

DISMISSAL


Dismissal of Defendants

Kathleen Garcia; Anita Garcia;

Clair D. Brown; Land Park

Investments, LLC


Case to Remain Open with

Remaining Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT Defendants, Kathleen Garcia; Anita Garcia; Clair D. Brown; Land Park Investments, LLC, are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants.

_____________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Ruffaine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2013
Case No.2:12-cv-02091-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Ruffaine

Case Details

Full title:Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff; v. John Ruffaine, et al, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2013

Citations

Case No.2:12-cv-02091-WBS-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2013)