From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Rallos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0369 GEB AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0369 GEB AC P

02-19-2013

TAMEL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's requests for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's requests for the appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 41and 42) are denied.

_____________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Rallos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0369 GEB AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Rallos

Case Details

Full title:TAMEL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. RALLOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0369 GEB AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)