From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Pollock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2007
2:06-cv-2135-GEB-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2135-GEB-KJM.

June 25, 2007


ORDER


On June 20, 2007, David R. Griffith, attorney for Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs Arthur J. Pollock and Ann K. Pollock, filed a declaration in response to the Order to Show Cause filed June 13, 2007. The declaration requests that Third Party Plaintiffs be given "until the end of June, 2007, to effectuate service upon [Third Party Defendants Mu Song ("John") Kwon and Yong Suk Kwon]" and states that "[a]s Third Party Defendants Ted Wong, Guo Jian Huang, and Lian Mao Huang, have not been located, there is no objection to having them dismissed without prejudice." (Griffith Decl. ¶¶ 2, 3.) Accordingly, Third Party Plaintiffs shall provide proof of service on Third Party Defendants Mu Song ("John") Kwon and Yong Suk Kwon on or before June 29, 2007, or the Third Party Defendant(s) upon which that proof of service has not been provided may be dismissed from this action. Further, Third Party Defendants Ted Wong, Guo Jian Huang, and Lian Mao Huang are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Pollock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 25, 2007
2:06-cv-2135-GEB-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Pollock

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR J. POLLOCK and ANN K. POLLOCK…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 25, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2135-GEB-KJM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

Karabensh v. Grant

The record shows that there has been no compliance with the statutes for settlement of the statement of the…

Compson v. Olson

The statute relating to such notice must be complied with or there is no authorized settlement of any…