From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Pfieffer

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 5, 2022
Civ. 22-0304 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2022)

Opinion

Civ. 22-0304 (WMW/BRT)

05-05-2022

R. Wayne Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Sarah Pfieffer; Amy Draeger; T.S. Barnetto; and Amy Pletscher, Judge, Defendants.


ORDER

BECKY R. THORSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This Court previously recommended the dismissal of this action without prejudice due to Plaintiff R. Wayne Johnson's failure to pay the filing fee for apply for in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status within the deadline established by the Clerk of Court. (See Doc. No. 6.) Johnson has subsequently applied for IFP status, making moot the basis for this Court's recommendation of dismissal. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of February 22, 2022, will be vacated.

That said, as this Court noted in the Report and Recommendation, “Johnson is a prolific litigant nationwide-so much so that he has for many years been ineligible to proceed IFP in federal court due to the operation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).” (Doc. No. 6 at 1 n.1) (citing Johnson v. United States Postal Service, No. CIV-20-350-D, 2020 WL 3027675, at *1 (W.D. Okla. June 5, 2020) (collecting cases)). Johnson indubitably “has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The complaint filed by Johnson in this matter does not establish that he “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Id. Accordingly, he may not proceed IFP, and his IFP application is denied pursuant to § 1915(g).

Johnson may proceed as a non-IFP litigant by submitting the $402.00 filing fee for this action within 14 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in a second recommendation that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The February 22, 2022 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 6) is VACATED.

2. Plaintiff R. Wayne Johnson's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 8) is DENIED.

3. Johnson must pay the $402.00 filing fee within 14 days of the date of this order, failing which it will be recommended that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Pfieffer

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
May 5, 2022
Civ. 22-0304 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Pfieffer

Case Details

Full title:R. Wayne Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Sarah Pfieffer; Amy Draeger; T.S…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: May 5, 2022

Citations

Civ. 22-0304 (WMW/BRT) (D. Minn. May. 5, 2022)