From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 18, 2015
Case No. CV 14-1598-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-1598-RGK (KK)

06-18-2015

ROBERT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. RAMAN PATEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and both the original and Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the original Report and Recommendation to which defendants D. Drayton, Lawson, J. Garcia, and Rush have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) defendants D. Drayton, Lawson, and J. Garcia's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied; (2) defendants D. Drayton, Lawson, J. Garcia, and Rush's Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part; and (3) defendant Dr. Raman Patel's Motion to Dismiss be denied. DATED: June 18, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 18, 2015
Case No. CV 14-1598-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Johnson v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. RAMAN PATEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 14-1598-RGK (KK) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Reid v. Green

It is clearly established that a failure to respond to Plaintiff's pain constitutes deliberate indifference…