From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Papagni

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 31, 2010
Civil No. 10-6055-TC (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-6055-TC.

March 31, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 12, 2010. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Papagni

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 31, 2010
Civil No. 10-6055-TC (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Papagni

Case Details

Full title:LARRY DALE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. FRANK PAPAGNI, JR., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 31, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-6055-TC (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2010)