From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action 2:13-cv-0025 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:13-cv-0025

04-11-2013

JEFFERY A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MUSKINGUM CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al., Defendants.


Judge Watson

Magistrate Judge King


ORDER

On March 1, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Aramark, Inc., be denied. Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 18. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no objection.

The Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 18, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Aramark, Inc., Doc. No. 15, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

MICHAEL H. WATSON , JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Johnson v. Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action 2:13-cv-0025 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MUSKINGUM CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:13-cv-0025 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)