From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1968 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1968 GEB GGH PS

05-13-2013

SHEPARD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CHESTER MITCHELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On February 15, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed February 15, 2013, are ADOPTED and defendants Berrocal's and Arosemena's motion to dismiss (dkt. 229) is GRANTED and these defendants are dismissed.

_______________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-1968 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:SHEPARD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CHESTER MITCHELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1968 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)