From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Miller-Stout

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 20, 2011
CASE NO. C11-5822-BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C11-5822-BHS-JRC

12-20-2011

WENDEL WAYNE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Respondent.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (A) and (B), and local Magistrate Judge Rules MJR3 and MJR4. Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 10).

There is no right to have counsel appointed in cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 unless an evidentiary hearing is required, because the action is civil, not criminal, in nature. Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F.2d 1164, 1168 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991)); see Ortiz v. Stewart, 149 F.3d 923, 939 (9th Cir. 1998) ("There is simply no constitutional right to an attorney in a state post-conviction proceeding."); see also Terrovona v. Kincheloe, 852 F.2d 424, 429 (9th Cir. 1988); and Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts."

The Court has not ordered an evidentiary hearing in this case and is awaiting the filing of an answer to the petition.

The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

___________________________

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Miller-Stout

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 20, 2011
CASE NO. C11-5822-BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Miller-Stout

Case Details

Full title:WENDEL WAYNE JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Respondent.

Court:WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Dec 20, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C11-5822-BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 20, 2011)