From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. McCain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jan 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.:1:18-1474 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.:1:18-1474

01-23-2019

CARL JOHNSON v. WARDEN McCAIN



MAG. JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES MEMORANUM RULING AND ORDER

In his Motion for Reconsideration, plaintiff, Carl Johnson, requested that we review the record and we have. All relevant documents are in the record. These include the original complaint, with attached completed ARP procedural history through Stage 2. Also, upon his motion, he was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in this proceeding. The matter was properly considered by the Magistrate Judge via Report and Recommendation to the undersigned. The previous ruling is correct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 13) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall attach a complete copy of the docket sheet to this ruling and order for Mr. Johnson's information.

SIGNED this 23RD day of January 2019, at Alexandria, Louisiana.

/s/ _________

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Johnson v. McCain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Jan 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO.:1:18-1474 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Johnson v. McCain

Case Details

Full title:CARL JOHNSON v. WARDEN McCAIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.:1:18-1474 (W.D. La. Jan. 23, 2019)