From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Le

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
Case No.2:11-cv-02378-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.2:11-cv-02378-LKK-CKD

01-31-2013

Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff; v. Julie Le, et al, Defendants.

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson


SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL


Dismissal of Defendant Julie Le


Case to Remain Open with Remaining Defendants

Defendant, Julie Le, individually and d/b/a World Nails II, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

Counsel is reminded that because defendant has filed an answer (ECF No. 19), his request to dismiss the case pursuant to stipulation is governed by Rule 41(a)(2), and is not properly made "pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)" (see ECF No. 20).

______________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Johnson v. Le

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
Case No.2:11-cv-02378-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Le

Case Details

Full title:Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff; v. Julie Le, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

Case No.2:11-cv-02378-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)