From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 12, 1938
196 A. 120 (Md. 1938)

Opinion

[No. 72, October Term, 1937.]

Decided January 12th, 1938.

Divorce — Abandonment — Corroboration of Husband's Testimony.

The burden of proof on plaintiff in a suit for divorce includes that of corroboration of his own testimony.

In a suit by a husband for a divorce, on the ground of his wife's desertion of him by cessation of all marital relations, through the wife's fault, for a period of three years, during which time they lived in the same house, held that the corroboration of the husband's testimony to this effect was insufficient to entitle him to a decree.

Decided January 12th, 1938.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (SOLTER, J.).

Bill by Wyeth Pennington Johnson against Florence C. Johnson. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

Milton Leven, for the appellant.

Henry L.D. Stanford, Jr., with whom were Samuel Campanaro and George W. Cameron on the brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 12, 1938
196 A. 120 (Md. 1938)
Case details for

Johnson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE C. JOHNSON, v . WYETH PENNINGTON JOHNSON

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 12, 1938

Citations

196 A. 120 (Md. 1938)
196 A. 120

Citing Cases

Kelsey v. Kelsey

It is sufficient if it lends substantial support to the complainant's testimony as to material and…