From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 5, 2012
CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM

10-05-2012

CARLEST MATTHEWS JOHNSON ADC #142752 PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH HUGHES et al DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the order entered this day, Johnson's claims against defendants Marybeth Floyd and Jennifer Horn are dismissed with prejudice. Johnson's claims against defendants Joseph Hughes, Corizon Inc., and Crystal Sims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of October 2012.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 5, 2012
CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:CARLEST MATTHEWS JOHNSON ADC #142752 PLAINTIFF v. JOSEPH HUGHES et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12CV00042 BSM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 5, 2012)