From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-00491-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-00491-DLB PC

03-29-2013

TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HARTLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

Plaintiff Timothy D. Johnson ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 23, 2012, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to amend, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. ECF No. 20. After receiving several extensions of time, Plaintiff was provided up to March 7, 2013 by which to file his amended complaint. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-00491-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES HARTLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-00491-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)