Opinion
Motion No CAF 21-01326 Docket Nos. V-625-20/21C V-625-20/20B V-3096-14/21C V-3096-14/21B
09-09-2022
IN THE MATTER OF TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. FLOR FORTY, (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON), AND GLORIA D. HENDERSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. IN THE MATTER OF FLOR FORTY, (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON), PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND GLORIA D. HENDERSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF FLOR FORTY (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. IN THE MATTER OF TOURE HENDERSON JOHNSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. FLOR FORTY (ALSO KNOWN AS FLOR FORTY CRUZ AND FLOR EASTON), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.
Counsel for appellant having moved to be relieved of assignment on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County, entered August 27, 2021, and for other relief, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied (see Matter of Fowler v Rothman, 198 A.D.3d 1374, 1374 [4th Dept 2021], lv dismissed 38 N.Y.3d 995 [2022]; Matter of Blagg v Downey, 132 A.D.3d 1078, 1079 [3d Dept 2015]).