Johnson v. Does

Full title: Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane and/or John DOES…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 12, 2007

234 F. App'x 543 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-55125.

Submitted June 4, 2007.^_

_ This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2.)

Filed June 12, 2007.

Joseph Johnson, Jr., Atascadero, CA, pro se.

Randall R. Murphy, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-07267-DSF.

Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^__

__ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

We have reviewed appellant's response to this court's April 10, 2007 order to show cause and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.