From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 8, 2022
2:22-CV-00041-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-00041-BSM

06-08-2022

FLOYD JOHNSON ADC #077727 PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANT


ORDER

Having reviewed the entire record de novo, Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 12] are adopted. Floyd Johnson's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. It is recommended that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Id. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 8, 2022
2:22-CV-00041-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD JOHNSON ADC #077727 PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-00041-BSM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 8, 2022)