Opinion
2:22-cv-00606-DAD-AC (PC)
02-12-2023
VANDELL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. Nos. 2, 12)
Plaintiff Vandell Johnson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 3, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 2) be denied because “the injunctive relief he seeks is not sufficiently related to his cognizable claims to give the court authority to grant relief.” (Doc. No. 12 at 19.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. (Id. at 11.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now passed. /////
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations issued on January 3, 2023 (Doc. No. 12) are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 2) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.