From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Dec 31, 2007
Case No. 6:04-cv-1157-Orl-28DAB (M.D. Fla. Dec. 31, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 6:04-cv-1157-Orl-28DAB.

December 31, 2007


ORDER


This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Petition for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. No. 24) filed October 10, 2007. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Report and Recommendation filed December 5, 2007 (Doc. No. 27) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. Plaintiff's Petition for Authorization to Charge a Reasonable Fee Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) is GRANTED. The judgment is amended to award fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $15,556.01 for attorney's fees to Plaintiff's counsel.

25% of the amount awarded is equal to $19,438.25. $3,882.24 has previously been awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Therefore, $19,438.25 less $3,882.24 is equal to $15,556.01.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Dec 31, 2007
Case No. 6:04-cv-1157-Orl-28DAB (M.D. Fla. Dec. 31, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:CINDY A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Dec 31, 2007

Citations

Case No. 6:04-cv-1157-Orl-28DAB (M.D. Fla. Dec. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Watterson v. Astrue

]" Id. at 804-05 (internal quotation marks omitted). Therefore, any fee awarded must both 1) be reasonable…

Alfaro v. Astrue

]" Id. at 804-05 (internal quotation marks omitted). Therefore, any fee awarded must both 1) be reasonable…