From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Cnty. of Horry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2012
Civil Action No.: 4:09-cv-1758-JMC-TER (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 4:09-cv-1758-JMC-TER

06-05-2012

BRAD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HORRY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, HUBERT MISHOE, JANET CARTER, JOHN WEAVER, TAMMY BARNHILL, and BRENDA GORSKI, Defendant.


ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Document # 156) all remaining deadlines in this case, or, in the alternative, to extend the deadline for jury selection. A similar Motion (Document # 146) was previously filed by Defendants and denied by the Court. Likewise, Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Document # 156) is DENIED.

_______________

Thomas E. Rogers, III

United States Magistrate Judge

June 5, 2012

Florence, South Carolina


Summaries of

Johnson v. Cnty. of Horry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Jun 5, 2012
Civil Action No.: 4:09-cv-1758-JMC-TER (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Cnty. of Horry

Case Details

Full title:BRAD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF HORRY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 5, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 4:09-cv-1758-JMC-TER (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2012)