From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Clays

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 12, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-02881 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-02881 MCE DAD P

04-12-2013

LUIS REYNALDO JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. D. CLAYS et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 15, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 15, 2013, are ADOPTED
IN FULL; and
2. Defendants Clays, Harrington, Knipp, and White are DISMISSED from this action.

_________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Clays

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 12, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-02881 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Clays

Case Details

Full title:LUIS REYNALDO JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. D. CLAYS et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-02881 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2013)