From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Chapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 2002
299 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2366N

November 26, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered May 16, 2002, which, in this matrimonial action, granted, in part, plaintiff's motion for pendente lite relief, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

ALLAN E. MAYEFSKY, for plaintiff-respondent.

PETER E. BRONSTEIN, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant has not demonstrated any basis for affording him relief from the interim award. Indeed, the motion court, when confronted with defendant's apparently self-created unemployment and questionable claim of limited future earnings, was warranted in imputing income to him on the basis of his past earnings and earning capacity (see Kent v. Kent, 291 A.D.2d 258, 259).

We have considered defendant's various arguments and find them all unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Chapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 2002
299 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Johnson v. Chapin

Case Details

Full title:JANET M. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALLAN M. CHAPIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 723

Citing Cases

Zappin v. Comfort

Although he presented no direct evidence of it, plaintiff claims that he was terminated from his position at…

Beth M. v. Joseph M.

The Husband's testimony with respect to his finances is contradictory and incredible. Faced with his…