Opinion
05-22-00154-CV
08-17-2022
TINA JOHNSON, Appellant v. DARLENE BIVENS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-00382
Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KEN MOLBERG, JUSTICE
We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the jurisdictional issue with an opportunity for appellee to respond.
When a party does not file a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, a notice of appeal is due thirty days after the judgment is signed or, with an extension motion, fifteen days after the deadline. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 26.3. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh'g) (timely filing of notice of appeal jurisdictional).
The trial court signed the order dismissing the case for want of prosecution on April 12, 2021. Because appellant did not file a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, the notice of appeal was due on May 12, 2021 or, with an extension motion, May 27, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on February 14, 2022.
Appellant filed a letter brief explaining that she did not timely file her notice of appeal due to medical reasons, a pending criminal proceeding, and her financial circumstances. This Court has no authority to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2. For this reason, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a).
JUDGMENT
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered this 17th day of August, 2022.