From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2022
CV 22-05679-JLS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-05679-JLS (SK)

11-01-2022

Warren Johnson. PLAINTIFFS, v. Bank of America et al. DEFEND ANUS'.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 20, 2022 the Court DENIED plaintiffs request to file the action without prepayment of the full filing fee with leave to amend or to correct a deficiency within 30 days. Plaintiff was advised that failure to follow the Court's instructions or otherwise respond to the order would lead to involuntary dismissal of the case.

[✓] Plaintiff has failed to submit a timely response or to timely submit the required documents ordered to be filed. Accordingly, the Request to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

[ ] Plaintiff has failed to pay the full amount of the required filing fee as ordered. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

[ ] The Court's order was returned undeliverable and more than 14 days have passed since that order was served with no notice of change of plaintiffs address filed as required by Local Rule 41-6. The Court thus has no means to communicate with plaintiff and can only assume that plaintiff no longer wants to prosecute the action. Accordingly, the Request to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2022
CV 22-05679-JLS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Warren Johnson. PLAINTIFFS, v. Bank of America et al. DEFEND ANUS'.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

CV 22-05679-JLS (SK) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)