From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 7, 2009
ACTION No. 07-1310-MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 7, 2009)

Summary

In Johnson, the ALJ erred because he found the plaintiff's depression severe at step two but "failed to consider or include any mental limitations in his RFC analysis."

Summary of this case from Jaroscak v. Colvin

Opinion

ACTION No. 07-1310-MLB.

January 7, 2009


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge Donald Bostwick, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 7, 2009
ACTION No. 07-1310-MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 7, 2009)

In Johnson, the ALJ erred because he found the plaintiff's depression severe at step two but "failed to consider or include any mental limitations in his RFC analysis."

Summary of this case from Jaroscak v. Colvin
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

ACTION No. 07-1310-MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

Verstraete v. Astrue

The RFC in the ALJ's hypothetical is therefore flawed as it pertains to a sit-stand option, and the VE's…

Robinson v. Astrue

the RFC assessment must be specific as to the frequency of the individual's need to alternate sitting and…