From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
No.2:10-cv-00078 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No.2:10-cv-00078

10-30-2012

RANDY DWAYNE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Knowles


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Randy Dwayne Johnson's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record ("Motion") (Doc. No. 14), filed along with a Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 15). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response (Doc. No. 18), to which Plaintiff did not file a Reply. Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Knowles issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. No. 19), recommending that the Motion be denied (id. at 21). The Report was filed on September 17, 2012, and it provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.)Neither party has filed an objection to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

____________________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
No.2:10-cv-00078 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RANDY DWAYNE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

No.2:10-cv-00078 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)