From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01438-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01438-MMD-PAL

01-14-2013

COLETTE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER


(Mtn to Serve - Dkt. #16)

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Colette Johnson's Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #16) filed January 8, 2013. The court has considered the Motion.

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in forma pauperis. On September 24, 2012, the court entered an Order (Dkt. #3) screening Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #4) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and directing the Clerk of Court to serve the Complaint pursuant to Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of the Court to issue summons for and serve process upon the Office of General Counsel for the Social Security Administration ("SSA") in Baltimore, Maryland; and the Attorney General in Washington, D.C. See Screening Order (Dkt. #3). The Clerk issued Summons (Dkt. #5) and mailed them with the Complaint to the Office of General Counsel and the Attorney General by certified mail as directed in the Screening Order. See Certified Mail Receipt (Dkt. #7). The docket reflects that service is complete on the Attorney General. See Summons Returned Executed (Dkt. #10). In an Order (Dkt. #11) entered November 7, 2012, the court directed service on the Office of Regional Chief Counsel for Region IX of the Social Security Administration in San Francisco, California, pursuant to 70 Fed. Reg. 73320 (Dec. 9, 2005). The Clerk complied, and service was returned executed. See Summons Returned Executed (Dkt. #14).

Additionally, the Screening Order directed the Clerk of Court to issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons to the U.S. Marshal for service. The Clerk issued Summons (Dkt. #5-2), and the U.S. Marshal's Service effected service. See Summons Returned Executed (Dkt. #17).

Having reviewed and considered the matter,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Party with Summons and Complaint (Dkt. #16) is DENIED AS MOOT.

________________

PEGGY A. LEEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 14, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01438-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Johnson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:COLETTE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-01438-MMD-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2013)